SEBI Proposes Major Ease in ‘Fit and Proper’ Rules for Market Players
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed a significant relaxation of its ‘fit and proper person’ criteria for market intermediaries. This move aims to reduce compliance burdens and introduce a more nuanced approach to regulation for entities like stockbrokers, depository participants, and mutual funds.
Shifting from Automatic Disqualification to Case-by-Case Review
The core of the proposed change lies in how SEBI handles legal proceedings against key personnel of these financial firms. Under the current framework, the mere filing of a First Information Report (FIR) or a charge sheet in cases involving economic offenses can lead to the automatic disqualification of an individual from being considered ‘fit and proper’.
SEBI now believes this automatic trigger may be too harsh. The regulator has suggested removing this provision. Instead, it proposes a system where the entire conduct of the person and the potential risk to investors are assessed on a case-by-case basis. This means an FIR or charge sheet would not be an immediate career-ending event, but one factor among many in a broader evaluation.
Rationale Behind the Regulatory Ease
SEBI’s consultation paper indicates the change is driven by a desire to ease business operations without compromising market integrity or investor protection. The automatic disqualification rule could potentially be misused for harassment, creating instability for regulated entities even before a court has determined guilt.
By adopting a principle-based approach, SEBI seeks to focus on substantive issues of character and integrity rather than procedural milestones in a legal case. The regulator emphasized that the ultimate assessment would consider the seriousness of the offense, the role of the individual, and the impact on the intermediary’s ability to serve investors fairly.
This shift aligns with a broader trend in financial regulation towards proportional and pragmatic oversight. It recognizes that the lengthy judicial process in India can sometimes keep allegations hanging over professionals for years, creating uncertainty for businesses they manage.
Potential Impact on Market Intermediaries and Investors
For market intermediaries, this proposal promises greater operational stability and reduced compliance anxiety. Key executives and promoters will have the opportunity to present their case before a disqualification, allowing for a more holistic review of their professional history and the specific circumstances of any legal issue.
For investors, SEBI assures that the primary goal of safeguarding their interests remains unchanged. The case-by-case assessment is designed to be rigorous, ensuring that individuals who pose a genuine risk to the market or client assets are still barred from holding key positions. The change is about the process, not the standard of fitness.
The proposal is now open for public comment, following which SEBI will finalize the amendments. If implemented, this revision would mark a mature evolution in India’s market regulation, balancing the need for clean governance with the practical realities of doing business in a complex legal environment.





